hoola huppi!! this will take some digging into, i see some weird arrows. get back later. meanwhile, awesome work yogi, thanks for the update and welcome back.

• favorite 117 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Yogi Sir,

 Thanks for the updates.

Syed 

• favorite 115 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Nice pictures & good information, thanks.

Are the two opposing flow directions (from near NTI towards BDA Jn) separated by levels or a barrier /divider ? If so, it should be okay since in through flowing traffic conditions, even a narrow road lane is capable of handling large volumes.

The U-turn, if clearly marked, should also work well, as traffic will flow smooth without disruption on the other lane/s.

The narrow stretch behind palace lodge however, being a residential area might take some beating as all traffic headed towards Cauvery Jn from Cantonment /Palace Main gate will be passing thro' it & if there are vehicles parked, can slow traffic down as also lead to pile ups very quickly.

• favorite 125 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

That NTI U-turn could be a significant issue. A separate waiting lane (for traffic coming from Mekhari Circle - so that traffic waiting for U-turn doesn't cause a big block) and then a joining lane to manage the merge should help here. You have drawn a cone/cup like thing in the image, is that the plan!?

Also, didn't understand the weird arrows between palace compound and palace lodge. Between palace lodge, and the hard divider, is there going to be traffic flowing in both directions - notice the red arrow when it emerges from the magic box, and the yellow arrows above and below it ?? Will there at least be another hard divider to separate the two directions?

I am referring this diagram:

[flickr-photo:id=2504103384,size=m]

• favorite 103 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Hi Silkboard, Will try an reply to your questions inline:
SB>> "That NTI U-turn could be a significant issue. A separate waiting lane (for traffic coming from Mekhari Circle - so that traffic waiting for U-turn doesn't cause a big block) and then a joining lane to manage the merge should help"
Praveen>> Please note the exit from the cauvery Underpass is also adding traffic to this very same U-turn Lane. When the "airport traffic" starts i do see this as a problem. SB>> "here. You have drawn a cone/cup like thing in the image, is that the plan!?" Praveen>> That cone like structure already has been constructed and i was told its pukka. (I will re-edit this post with pictures some time later this evening)
SB>> Also, didn't understand the weird arrows between palace compound and palace lodge. Between palace lodge, and the hard divider, is there going to be traffic flowing in both directions - notice the red arrow when it emerges from the magic box, and the yellow arrows above and below it ?? Will there at least be another hard divider to separate the two directions?"
Praveen>> OK i guess I could have done better at sketch will try to see how i can refine the schematic. The Red and Blue arrows represent traffic that flows above the Flyover. All the yellow arrows arrows are slower traffic at the road level. [flickr-photo:id=2502883868,size=m] This is a photo towards Palace / Cantt Station. I was told in there would be a small circle / Umbrella for Cop in the middle.
There would be Water filled plastic separators that have been marked in the schematic that is online. So what happens is when you look at traffic from Mekhri circle to Windsor manor Jn there is a U turn to Malleswaram / Guttahalli passing thru the Magic box. This is what came to my mind:
The U turn at NTI can be eliminated and the Magic box @ BDA be used as a pass thru as well as a U turn back towards Cauvery Junction, with suitable alteration in the traffic patern. that way the narrow road behind Palace lodge can remain a less used road too. This will also ensure the traffic flow towards the cauvery Jn will be smooth.
On second thoughts, I assume the cauvery Junction is not wide enought to handle higher density faster movement, this NTI Uturn will work as a buffer (read speed breaker) to  the oncoming traffic, there by make it look more smooth.
Any views on this SB/TS others?
--
Praveen Sundaram
AkA PhotoYogi

• favorite 121 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Even I see the u-turn at NTI as a potential bottle neck.

Build up of vehicles for U-turn will hamper the traffic wanting to take the straight road. Because of the erratic drivers who would try to go ahead rather than waiting in a single queue. This needs to be controlled in some way by proper barricading of the u-turn queue and proper direction boards (many of them) well before the u-turn so the people get in the queue sooner.

• favorite 116 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

This looks a decent job.  Will get a chance to sample the final product on the way back from BIAL on May 24.

Srivathsa

• favorite 119 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Photoyogi :

// The U turn at NTI can be eliminated and the Magic box @ BDA be used as a pass thru as well as a U turn back towards Cauvery Junction, with suitable alteration in the traffic patern. that way the narrow road behind Palace lodge can remain a less used road too. This will also ensure the traffic flow towards the cauvery Jn will be smooth //

In my opinion, this cannot work !

How will traffic on the narrow road behind Palace lodge remain less used ? In addition to the traffic from cantt side, you now added ones coming from mekhri circle & bound for Bashyam circle too.

Judging by yr drawing, no alteration of flow directions is possible as conflicts will occur. A vehicle cannot turn from the neck of the underpass, it has to be out of the mouth & then execute the turn. Such a turn to the right will conflict with vehicles using the other underpass going in the other direction !

What about the additional distance for the traffic from mekhri circle & bound for Bashyam circle ? It is quite a distance from Cauvery Jn to BDA Jn, is'nt it ?

• favorite 108 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Hi Naveen,

Thanks for your views, I think will clarify a couple of things as per my understanding.

a) The current Traffic pattern schematic is what is proposed by the BBMP I assume in consultation with the Bangalore Traffic Police.
b) The Distance from the Cauvery Jn To the BDA Jn is about ~800 meters
The distance from the current NTI "U" turn to the Magic Box elements is about ~100m
c) All traffic bound from Windsor manor Jn towards Cauvery travel only over the Flyover
b) Any traffic servicing the Houses / Offices along the BDA side will be at road level but have to take a left turn leading to the Guttahalli / Malleswaram.

Now my argument is as follows:
As a resident of that area there existed a U turn around the same point where the Magic Box currently stands which is why i had naturally recomended the same.

The other reason for my recommendation,  that if the NTI U turn is removed and traffic flows thru the Magic box it will come out in the correct direction along with the flow from Windsor manor joining Cauvery Junction.
But then the Underpass will not become signal less and would have to be manned.

Now, the question arises how do the chaps from Malleshwaram get to Windsor manor side or cantt station which will then send this off on a huge circuitous loop, via the narrow cauvery junction underpass which is a worse case which i would not want to recommend.

With these reasons i would Agree with you :-) I hold back my comment until i can come up with some thing that will justify my argument.

--
Praveen Sundaram
AkA PhotoYogi

• favorite 102 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Is the U-turn really needed at NTI? If you see the traffic, all of it comes from Mekhri u/p (barring occasional non-regular users when some exhibitions/functions happen within palace grounds with exits between Mekhri u/p and cauvery junction). So, it makes sense to route this traffic via Sadashivnagar. That is, they should proceed over the Mekhri u/p towards IISc and then take left turn (I think second or third) that joins Bhashyam circle.

I think U-turn should be completely removed - there is no need to have it! Those non-regular users who join this road inbetween can always go towards BDA jn, take left towards cantt. and take a U-turn deeper into the road and come back and pass under the BDA u/p to go towards Bhashyam circle - this shouldn't be a hassle as they won't use it regularly and this traffic volume too would be low.

• favorite 107 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Do you need to use cauvery jn underpass ?? I dont think, but am not sure.

What I think is, as marked on the picture - you need to arrive on the road nearer to NTI (I think this is possible), turn left into the magic box, go straight, if headed to cantt or take a U turn & again turn left & join the traffic headed towards Windsor Manor.

Am I correct ?

• favorite 99 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Naveen, Please ref my sketch,
Proposed Traffic Flow
[flickr-photo:id=2504103384,size=m]

The proposed left turn as you come down Windsor Manor right opposite the Magic Box elements used to be one way in the opposite direction than as what has now been proposed. please see

my earlier traffic analysis at the BDA Jn
[flickr-photo:id=2342287029,size=m]
This used to be a rather busy junction with traffic wait times of 120 sec to 300 sec in peak hours. This road used to service users from Malleshwaram headed to Cant station or central Business areas. Now this traffic will be routed thru the turn before NTI and will pass in the right side of the road for a brief section and take a left turn into the Magic Box and go thru.

Now, If this access is removed users from Malleshwaram and other areas will have to approach cant station and Central business areas (MG Road etc) via
1) Bhasyam Circle - sadashivnagar - Cauvery Underpass and then Sanky road

2) Swastik - Shivananda circle - Chalukya Junction Sankey road
now both these alternate routes are already congested. This is what i had in mind when i supported your reasoning.
As I look at how the solution has been arrived at looks like the planners want to distribute the congestion that exists and not really address the issue with the right tools. i.e. providing dependable working public transport.

-- Praveen Sundaram AkA PhotoYogi

• favorite 111 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

You've done a real neat job, great & clear picture - only the lines are a bit too thin. Also, I understand the point now - you cannot use this route from Malleswaram to Cantt via BDA Jn left turn ! Correct ?

With your re-markings however, you realize there are numerous conflicts : 

Examples are : 

1) U turn at BDA is from top to bottom thro' left underpass; BDA to palace /cantt is thro' the same underpass, but in an opposite direction; Palace to Cauvery Jn is from top to bottom on right underpass & will conflict with BDA to palace /cantt.

2) BDA turn to Windsor Manor is from bottom to top on right underpass & is in the opposite direction of Palace to cauvery Jn.

3) Windsor Manor to Gangenahalli is on bottom & will conflict with BDA to Windsor Manor.

There may be more.

To manage this, there will have to be two cops at each end of the tunnels with communication between them to halt & start flows indicated, which may not be a practicable solution. When cops are not there, there will be vehicles blocked inside the underpasses, facing one another.

The earlier plan was far better & allowed signal free flows in all cases. The only problem is the narrow road you mentioned. Is there no approach to the road near NTI from malleswaram anywhere ? If you come on to that, it shd be possible to go via BDA Jn, is'nt it ?

• favorite 111 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Hi Naveen, The black background schematic was done some 2 months back when they started off the work, as such i had not put in a lot of effort on analysing the conflicts but only superimposed what was the traffic flow pattern in the *then* current situation. (before the junction was built) I brought your attention to the older sketch only to tell you about the traffic from Guttahalli/Malleshwaram headed to cantt station/MG road areas. So now with flyover in place your point 1,2,3 are possibly right and traffic flow can be suitably altered. -- Praveen Sundaram AkA PhotoYogi

• favorite 99 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Here is a Photo update of the NTI U turn, My Sketch shows a cup like structure but its actually only half the cup.
The exit of the U turn seems OK
[flickr-photo:id=2507599106,size=m] [flickr-photo:id=2507607214,size=m]
[flickr-photo:id=2506775693,size=m]
Meanwhile the Road above the Flyover seems to be getting its final coat of tar
[flickr-photo:id=2507623356,size=m] [flickr-photo:id=2506791657,size=m]
[flickr-photo:id=2507626706,size=m]
Notice the exit of the flyover to the road before the U-turn, there is a small park/trees in the middle of the road that is causing a bottle neck. I love Green Bangalore and am not for cutting down trees but i guess this will have to go to make way for the traffic.

-- Praveen Sundaram AkA PhotoYogi

• favorite 108 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

though i dont yet understand them yet, for the first time, i am actually seeing some geometry and curves. what going on yogi? didya powwow with the paalike-walas or what? :) they need to fill them up with some nice little shrubs in pots, mebbe some nice ferns?

• favorite 115 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

So they have waiting and merging lanes at the spot of the U-turn on Bellary Road!! Great. But, the strategy has to be U-turns with waiting lanes, but at longer intervals.

In general, we should appreciate the attempt at making Bellary junction signal free. But I think the attempt should instead be to have 1 signal per 3-4 kilometers, which is where the U-turns/left turns would be available with waiting lanes. Without a good number signals (dams) at regular intervals, too much traffic (water) will collect at the one or two that will exist, and area before the first signal or choking point will flood (submerge) with traffic (water).

Some more things around pedestrians should help further

• Road over/under bridges for ped-crossing
• Metal barricades on pavements long Bellary Road to prevent pedestrian spillover on the road
• Construction of smooth pavements all along, to discourage pedestrians from walking on the road

• favorite 110 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

[quote] I love Green Bangalore and am not for cutting down trees but i guess this will have to go to make way for the traffic. [/quote] After the flyover public busses will go left?, so hence the cluster of trees can remain theere - which actually makes it a pretty nice bus bay!

• favorite 114 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

just looking at prav's pics with those trees and the Grey skies made me nostalgic. was reading the other day, older the trees greater their ability to act complimentary to our polluting ways.

• favorite 124 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

Photoyogi: Very good pictures again, thanks.

SB's post - What about the pedestrian subway ? Are there proper arrangements for entry /exit with protection /safety & means to prevent intrusion /parking of 2-wheelers inside ? TS had posted a nice arrangement drawing earlier, with bollards to prevent entry & misuse.

Also, you did'nt specify if it is possible to go from Malleswaram to Cantt via BDA Jn with the new flow pattern to be followed. I was looking up the map & saw a possible route of reaching this road near NTI :

Using Bhadra Temple St from Swimming pool extn (past Vinayaka circle), & on Guttahalli (2nd) main road - Venkata swamy raju rd, & then branching off to this road off NTI - what do you think ? Maybe this can work to avoid going past Cauvery Jn or Swastik ?

• favorite 122 Likes
• | login or register to post comments

I happened to go over the magic boxes at the BDA junction yesterday, and my first thoughts were not very pleasant about the flyover (overpass whatever). I was going from cauvery junction towards windsor manor and there were a few things I noticed right away:

1) The ramp is a bit steep and not so smooth.

2) The approach from the cauvery junction side is not such a straight road, you need to go a little towards the right and then towards the left to align your vehicle for a proper approach.

3) The railings on the sides of the overpass/flyover should be a little more higher and stronger. I fear over enthusiastic drivers (specially at night)

Still it is a step forward and hopefully will smoothen the flow of traffic to some extent. 

• favorite 116 Likes
• | login or register to post comments